Two-Year MMP Discounts: Savings vs. Lock-In
Learn when a two-year MMP deal pays off, how to compare total cost and lock-in risk, and when Airbridge Core’s monthly option fits.
The short answer on a two-year MMP discount
- The MMP terms reviewed put fees, volume, and contract duration in customer-specific Order Forms at AppsFlyer and Adjust.
- A two-year offer fits when its 24-month cost and exit terms suit your app's likely plan.
- Include usage charges, setup, renewal terms, and the cost of leaving in the comparison.
- Airbridge Core gives small paid-app teams a monthly comparison point: a 30-day free trial, then $40+/mo, with no annual contract.
Is a two-year MMP discount normal?
Singular's pricing page lists a free plan at $0 per conversion with 15,000 paid conversions.
Public MMP documents show why the actual offer matters. AppsFlyer's Master Services Agreement says fees and billing frequency are set through an Order Form, with its default fees paid in advance annually unless the Order Form sets another schedule. Adjust's published General Terms likewise assign the services, volume, fees, and term to the Order Form. Those terms make the buyer's written scope and payment schedule the useful unit of comparison.
Published price points also use different usage measures. Tenjin's MMP glossary lists a paid starting point of $200 per month for up to 10,000 attributions.
The written offer should state the baseline price for the exact package, the price for each month through month 24, the usage tier, and every eligibility condition. That schedule makes the advertised percentage testable against the services and expected usage your team will buy. If the offer says “20% off,” the meaningful question is whether that discount applies to the same services and expected usage your team will actually buy.
The written rate schedule should show the discounted price in each month of the 24-month term. It should also state whether usage rates can change during the term and which price and renewal term apply after month 24.
For a small team still testing paid acquisition, the chance that the app, budget, campaign mix, or measurement setup changes has a cash value. A lower monthly average only pays off when the team continues using the contracted scope long enough to earn the discount.
Are the offers comparable enough to calculate savings?
They are comparable once both prices describe the same service, measurement volume, and period. Start with the work your app needs, then normalize the cost of delivering that work across 24 months.
The UK government's Total Cost of Ownership guidance evaluates options on lifetime cost, including exit and transition, after checking capability, security, scalability, transferability, support, and manageability. The US General Services Administration's cloud contracting best practices separately recommends a like-to-like analysis of proposed prices and costs. Those public procurement principles fit this decision: compare two equivalent outcomes, not two unrelated headline amounts.
| Comparison item | What to align across both offers | Why the distinction changes the total |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement scope | The app or apps, paid channels, attribution features, reporting, integrations, support level, and any onboarding work | A lower price can cover a smaller service bundle or omit work your team still has to buy. |
| Usage unit | The provider's billed measure, included monthly amount, overage threshold, rate, and any volume tier | Tenjin's 10,000-attribution starting limit and Airbridge's 500K data-point allowance count different units; compare each offer using its own definition and the app's expected activity. |
| Usage forecast | A low, expected, and high monthly case using your paid-acquisition plans | A small change in activity can move a usage-based bill into another tier or add overage charges. |
| Subscription and revenue workflow | The event inputs, revenue reporting, and third-party connections needed for your current billing setup | A subscription app's trial starts, conversions, renewals, and refunds affect which reporting or integration work your team needs. |
| One-time work | Implementation, data migration, setup, training, and any paid configuration | These costs can offset a contract discount even when the subscription line is lower. |
| Payment schedule | Monthly or annual invoices, prepaid amounts, due dates, credits, and usage true-ups | Invoice timing affects working cash, while the total amount owed measures the price of the commitment. |
| Renewal and price protection | Renewal term, notice deadline, post-term price, usage rates, and escalation cap | A strong initial discount can be followed by a higher renewal rate or a longer automatic renewal. |
| Exit and transition | Termination rights, data access and export, extraction charges, and transition support | A low entry price can cost more if a product change or provider switch makes leaving difficult. |
Virginia's 2025 IT procurement manual recommends scalable usage fees and payment in arrears for supplier-hosted SaaS.
For RevenueCat, Adapty, or Superwall setups, compare the same subscription-event handoffs in both proposals and keep the billing platform constant.
An attributed install, a data point, and a monthly active user are different billing units.
How much will the discount save over two years?
Calculate the whole 24-month payment schedule, then compare it with the monthly alternative over the same 24 months. Keep the vendor's advertised discount, your cash savings against the alternative, and the potential cost of exiting early as three separate numbers.
- Build the two-year total. Add each month's base charge, expected usage charges, required add-ons, and one-time setup or migration costs. Include any written year-two increase and applicable taxes. Sum scheduled payments for all 24 months.
- Build the alternative total. Use the same scope and monthly usage assumptions for the monthly option. Add the same kinds of implementation, integration, and support costs where they apply.
- Calculate each comparison. The discount versus the vendor's own baseline equals its undiscounted 24-month total minus its discounted 24-month total. The savings versus the monthly alternative equals the alternative's 24-month total minus the discounted commitment total.
- Price the change scenario. If the app might stop advertising, change attribution needs, or replace its provider, add the contract payments still owed under that scenario and any migration or export charges. Compare that amount with the savings the team has earned by then.
For example, assume a vendor's same-scope baseline is $1,000 per month and its written offer cuts the monthly price by 20% for all 24 months. That creates a $800 monthly charge and a $19,200 subscription total, compared with $24,000 at baseline, so the advertised-term discount is $4,800.
Now assume a comparable monthly alternative costs $900 per month for 24 months and requires the same support and usage. Its total is $21,600, so the two-year offer saves $2,400 against that alternative before setup, usage differences, or other charges.
Write the offer's year-by-year amounts into the calculation. If the same hypothetical $800 monthly price rises by 5% in month 13, the total is $9,600 for year one plus $10,080 for year two, or $19,680. Against the same $21,600 monthly alternative, the remaining modeled advantage becomes $1,920.
Invoice timing determines how much cash the team needs at signing. A $19,200 commitment billed annually may require $9,600 at the start of each year, while monthly invoices spread the same total across 24 payments. If the vendor requires the full $19,200 up front, record that amount as cash required at signing and compare it with the team's runway; do not count the prepayment twice as both a payment and a separate cost.
A shutdown makes the unpaid remainder a direct cash obligation. In the example above, the team earns $100 per month in savings by paying $800 rather than $900. If the app stops paid acquisition after month 12, and the two-year agreement still requires payment for months 13 through 24, those unused months cost $9,600 before any exit charges. The team would have earned $1,200 in first-year price savings, so the unused commitment outweighs the discount in that shutdown scenario.
A two-year offer earns a financial yes when the real all-in price advantage stays larger than the costs attached to the team's plausible change scenarios. Build the low, expected, and high usage cases from campaign plans, and repeat the calculation if spend, event volume, or subscription activity could move into a different pricing tier.
Which flexibility and exit terms can outweigh the savings?
The critical clauses define how long you pay, how quickly the price can move, and how much work a provider change creates.
| Term | What the written agreement should state | Practical consequence for a small app team |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment and termination | Whether either side can terminate for convenience, what happens if the app closes or stops buying ads, and which fees remain due | A team that owes the full remaining term carries the payment obligation after its acquisition plan changes. |
| Renewal | Whether renewal happens automatically, how long the next term lasts, and the exact deadline and method for non-renewal | A missed notice deadline can extend the service and push a team into another payment period. |
| Price changes | A renewal increase cap or stated schedule and a rule for usage-rate changes during the current term | A monthly discount can shrink if the rate or overage price can increase before the term ends. |
| Usage thresholds | Included volume, volume definition, overage rate, alerts, and the process for a plan-tier change | A team can estimate a bill and catch rising usage before the invoice arrives. |
| Payment and refunds | Prepayment timing, non-cancellable fees, credits, and any refund rights | The cash exposure is clear if the team changes tools or ceases operations before the term ends. |
| Data access and export | Export formats, permitted access after termination, deletion timing, and any extraction fee | The team can plan how to preserve campaign history and transfer reporting records. |
| Transition help | Vendor assistance, time window, support cost, and named deliverables during migration | The app team can estimate the engineering and reporting time involved in changing providers. |
The US General Services Administration's cloud buying guidance recommends setting out an exit plan, data recovery method, alternative solutions, and data-extraction price before a public-sector cloud purchase. The same planning question helps an app team: what data can you retrieve, in what format, for what price, and during what access window?
AppsFlyer's Terms of Use say fees are non-cancellable and paid fees are non-refundable unless the agreement says otherwise. That page also states a 45-day non-renewal notice by default and allows up to a 7% fee increase for a renewed subscription package, unless the Order Form provides otherwise. Its separate Master Services Agreement sets a 30-day non-renewal notice in its default renewal clause. The signed documents should identify which agreement controls and give one unambiguous notice deadline.
Adjust's General Terms and Conditions say neither party may terminate for convenience unless the agreement or Order Form provides for it. The same terms reserve a 5% fee increase at each renewal, require advance payment for the whole term by default, and allow separate invoices when usage exceeds Order Form limits. Those clauses are examples of published terms; negotiate the conditions applicable to your proposal in the actual Order Form.
An export window belongs in the vendor's exit terms, alongside the account-access and data-deletion dates. Adjust's posted terms say account access ends when the agreement and Order Form expire or terminate, and customer data is deleted within 60 days, subject to legal retention requirements. That gives the team a concrete migration window rather than an assumption about future access.
For a small team, an exit term is useful even when leaving seems unlikely. An app can pause spending, change its paywall, replace its subscription setup, or shift its channel mix during a 24-month period. A termination right or a price cap can be worth more than a small monthly reduction when it protects the budget or preserves time to migrate.
How does Airbridge Core work as a monthly alternative?
Airbridge Core is a useful comparator for a small team buying paid ads on Google, Meta, Apple Ads, or TikTok. The Airbridge pricing page lists a 30-day free trial, then $40+/mo with 500K data points included and no annual contracts; the page describes Core for teams running paid ads on those networks.
The Core plan page gives the usage detail: 500,000 data points are included, and each additional data point costs $0.0001. Core also includes up to two third-party integrations. That allowance gives a team a visible starting point for its calculation, while the overage rate makes the usage assumption explicit.
At the current $40+/mo entry price, 24 months would total $960 if the monthly rate stayed unchanged and the account remained within its included data-point allowance. At 50,000 data points above the allowance each month, the listed overage would add $5 per month, bringing that example to $45+ per month and $1,080 over 24 months if the same usage and entry rate continued.
Use the plan's unit as written: data points. Do not compare 500,000 data points directly with another vendor's attributed-install limit.
The monthly structure suits a team that wants to test channel measurement while retaining the option to change its plan as acquisition changes. The 30-day trial gives the team a period to assess the workflow before the paid Core price begins. Core's no-annual-contract term gives a small team a shorter commitment horizon than a two-year offer, with expected usage included in the monthly cost comparison.
Airbridge Core's pricing is especially relevant if the app's campaigns run across the listed ad channels and the projected data-point count fits the included allowance. For needs beyond Core's listed channels, data allowance, or two included third-party integrations, the quoted scope determines the additional cost. Your projected channels, data-point volume, and integration needs determine the relevant comparison price.
A two-year provider can still be the better choice when the all-in saving is meaningful, the app's scope is stable, and the written exit and escalation terms fit the team's risk. Airbridge Core earns a place in the comparison when a small paid-app team values a published monthly starting price, a defined data-point allowance, and no annual contract.
Which offer should your team choose?
Choose the two-year offer when its verified savings survive the usage forecast, the quote locks the relevant rates and scope, and the team can accept the full term if its product plan changes. Choose a monthly option when flexibility has more value than the remaining price gap, especially while the app is still testing channels or adjusting paid spend.
| Your situation | Better fit | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Stable app, steady paid spend, and a 24-month plan you expect to keep | The two-year offer, if it has a complete price schedule, locked usage rates, and documented exit terms | A predictable workload gives the team a better chance to realize the full-term price difference. |
| Early-stage app, uncertain campaign mix, or changing subscription flow | Airbridge Core's published monthly option, if its channels and allowance fit | No annual contract limits the duration of the commitment, while the 500K monthly data-point allowance and overage rate support a usage-based cost estimate. |
| The quote saves money only when current usage stays below a narrow threshold | A monthly option or a revised offer with volume protection | A step-up in overages can absorb the discount, so the comparison should follow low, expected, and high event volume. |
| A two-year price is attractive but data export or early exit remains unclear | Negotiate the missing terms before signing | The savings have a value only alongside the cost and timing of leaving. |
Before accepting a two-year discount, request a single written schedule that answers the following:
- The undiscounted baseline and the discounted price for every month of the 24-month term.
- Each billed usage unit, included volume, overage rate, usage tier, alert threshold, and any cap on in-term rate changes.
- The same included networks, attribution features, integrations, support, and onboarding across the quoted package and monthly comparison.
- The invoice schedule, prepaid amount, one-time charges, taxes, credits, and consequences if actual usage exceeds the estimate.
- The automatic renewal term, exact non-renewal deadline, renewal price cap, and whether renewal prices can change the usage rate.
- Termination rights, fees remaining after termination, refund or credit treatment, and what happens if the app closes or changes direction.
- Data export format, fee, access window, deletion date, and transition assistance after termination.
Run the same 24-month usage cases against the monthly alternative, then weigh the price difference against the operational cost of a change scenario.
For teams whose paid channels match the Core Plan listing, Get Started Free starts Airbridge's 30-day trial. Price the allowance against your own data-point volume before deciding how a monthly option fits your acquisition budget.
FAQS
FAQ
Is paying annually the same as signing a two-year contract?
No. Invoice frequency describes when cash is due, while the contract term describes how long the commitment lasts. AppsFlyer's MSA treats payment frequency and contract duration separately: fees are paid in advance annually or at the Order Form's billing frequency, while the Subscription Package dates are set in that form.
Should I compare a two-year discount with the vendor's list price?
Use the list price to calculate the vendor's stated discount, then compare the discounted total with the actual monthly alternative you could buy. The second comparison shows whether the offer saves money against your real choice.
Does Airbridge Core commit my team to a two-year price?
No. Core is published as a 30-day free trial, then $40+/mo with no annual contract; its cost can rise with data points above the 500K included allowance. A month-to-month structure gives flexibility, while the two-year quote needs its own written schedule.
What number should I ask the vendor to guarantee?
A useful written quote states the total fees for months 1 through 24, the usage assumptions behind that total, and the maximum price increase during the commitment and renewal. A single total alongside its usage and exit conditions is easier to compare than a percentage discount on its own.
Get Started Free
See how these criteria hold up on the real thing.
